Bill Gates: The Geo-Politicization of His ‘Daily Show’ Interview
and
Retrospective: The Early Days of Lexicon Evolution – The Gates Contribution
© 2010 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor
The wealthiest person on the planet for a decade and a half appeared on Jon Stewart’s January 25, 2010 show. The two, privy to the most recent developments north of the 49th Parallel, turned the program into a platform to condemn Chinada and acknowledge the on-going contributions of their Canadian representative.
Bill Gates joined the coalition during its early 2006 phase of evolution. He stepped into the diplomatic corridor in early May of that year to introduce what’s become an often-employed lexiconic constituent – the color of justice. How it came to be was documented in the undisseminated Fiefdom treatise chapter What Was on the Other Channel as Super-Multi-Billionaire Bill Gates Was Being Interviewed on the CNBC Deconstruction Channel?:
He has been confident for years and especially since diplomacy became coercive that his vocalizations in his apartment were being monitored by both sides of the East-West ideological divide. The question was whether his recommendation that a new color be added to the international discourse on condemnation, accountability, compensation and reform, purple, was heard and was going to be acted upon. After all, there was a risk that both existing colors and their combinations might raise suspicions in the general public and the sociopaths north of the 49th Parallel would get complacent with them. So, he suggested the appropriate color of purple be adopted. When both Bill Gates and Donny Deutsche wore shades of this color, of course, the Canadian lawyer wanted to interpret this in his and his country’s favor. However, as will all interpretations for Fiefdom documentation, corroboration was needed to cement the perception he was seeing a Triple “E” initiative.
[…]
Much time, thought, expense and coordination went into preparing the new color for its early morning to prime time introduction. There was an enormous tag-team effort to deliver it from so many different sources and broadcast all within a 24 hour period: CNBC, CBS, Mr. Gates, the Sambora publicist team, the Witherspoon publicist team, Judge Judy’s publicist team, Queen Latifah’s team and the advertising firm with the contract for ‘Covergirl’.
[…]
This one example of the Triple “E” coalition ‘going the extra mile’ is just another in so many instances of an affirmation of the insidious geo-political threats discovered and described in the Fiefdom series. It also evidences the unbending will of the international community to contain them and punish those in Canada who incubated them, promoted them and continued them three years ago when western leaders said stop. Instead, the Chinada elite thumbed its nose, literally, pushed ahead, advancing Article 7 gains, and thought it could hunker down, ride out the baseball sized hailstones of condemnation and perpetuate for another generation the last democratic fiefdom.
How coalition activity was transcribed, documented and entered into the diplomacy archive beginning in early 2006 is described in Documenting Coalition Diplomacy:
It became his methodology of entry into the diplomatic record to first document coalition – or Triple “E” – activity broadcast on American and international television on VHS tape. By the end of July 2008 he accumulated in his library of initiatives designed to liberate Canada from the grip of trans-generational corruption and Chinese militarization eighty-one six-hour tapes*.
* As of late December 2008, there are eighty-eight.
In one of those early VHS tapes is the CNBC broadcast of the Bill Gates interview on the May 8, 2006 broadcast of ‘The Big Idea with Donny Deutsche’. Using his digital camera he is now able to demonstrate with the visual aid of video stills those moments that were geo-politicized and reproduce using this medium the communiqués generated during that period of time.
What was going on in the collective minds of the coalition on that day? Eight days earlier there was the ‘from lab to slab’ utterance by the Thomson CTV employee. And three days previous to that President Bush declared war against the Chinada High Command.
Bill Gates and the Last Democratic Fiefdom
© 2006 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor
On Monday, May 8, 2006, the richest man of the late 20th and early 21st century spent an hour being interviewed on CNBC’s ‘The Big Idea with Donny Deutche’. When the annoucement was made previous week that this was going to take place, the question became would this interview be a platform for Triple “E” coaltion initiatives.
This chapter identifies with specificity twenty-nine times Mr. Gates employs the lexicon. The first comes at the beginning of the interview where he executes what would later become known as the Staul Maneuver, and timed to “bright people who’ve been now given the resources”, referring to the Custodian Chief who back then had the international community’s diplomacy to help effect fundamental change in Canadian governance.
He immediately goes on to execute what would be the Colbert Maneuver to “solve problems”.
Then this entry:
The most revealing occurred when Donny asked Mr. Gates “what pisses you off the most?”. To the public, the answer was “Nothing really”. However, he employed the international discourse on accountability to convey the opposite answer. At 7:04 p.m. PT, Mr. Gates didn’t execute a short, ambiguous quasi-Clooney Maneuver*. It was protracted; meant to be interpreted as an unequivocal sign of his decision to lend his name to the Triple “E” coalition.
* Later the Anderson Maneuver
When Donny asks him about his corporate strategy, suggesting Microsoft watches as competitors develop a product and service and then “leapfrogs”, phrasing the question in a joking fashion, “Is this whole Google thing part of your master plan?”, Mr. Gates effects another Staul Maneuver. Producers swiftly capitalize to this pre-planned insertion of a reference to the Chinada global hegemony initiative by filming an Asian member of the audience.
Moments later the interviewee executes another Colbert Maneuver, timed to “we just get out there [C.M.] and get partners”, to underscore how the coalition was at that time proactively assembling what is today a global conglomerate of public and private sector parties determined to contain China and fix Canada.
A bit later he states, employing another Staul Maneuver, “often very leading edge things are coming in [universities]; so I may [S M.] have a particular problem that if I don’t really create the opportunities to see things that are just starting up…”. This was another articulation of the emerging Chinada threat.
Mr. Gates red flags “Today the ones that would stand out [C.M.] are…”, and Donny corroborates the observation that the Custodian Chief has been elevated to the pinnacle of international attention with what would become the Zeta-Jones Maneuver.
He also identifies as geo-relevant, using an Anderson Maneuver, “Let’s see if we can’t lead in this business”, referring to the community of democracy, rule of law and human rights advocates taking charge of how humanity evolves.
And finally in an answer he begins with “one of the most powerful”, again using the Colbert Maneuver to draw attention to the efficacy of the coalition as it was back then observed to be building that had the ability to challenge China’s unlawful foreign policy.
During the hour-long interview producers displayed captions in a rotating fashion that incorporated the numbers constituent of the lexicon.
… captions that ran throughout the hour. “Gates on cover of Time 8 Times”, “$28.8 Billion” in philanthropy, “$6.2 Billion” invested by Microsoft in 2005.
The foregoing set the stage for what’s documented in The Lexicon in Action: Bill Gates: A One-on-Geo-Political-One With You, Coalition Profiles Bill Gates, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett Geo-Politicize CNBC Town Hall Meeting; and The World’s Two Wealthiest Service the Custodian Chief Executive’s International Persona and Agree with the Coalition’s Assessment of Quantum and Bill & Melinda Gates: The Geo-Politicization of an NBC ‘Meet the Press’ Interview. And it was preceded the January 25th interview on ‘The Daily Show’.
Before describing this most recent contribution to diplomacy, it ought to be recognized that round-the-clock surveillance of the diplomatic corridor, aka the Custodian Chief’s apartment, and the synergistic bond and camaraderie that existed back then led to what is documented in Bill Gates and the Last Democratic Fiefdom: Revisited:
The Canadian lawyer’s cognitive faculties crashed on Thursday, June 15, 2006. His Triple “E” family got worried and rallied around him. Since the $50 billion man, Bill Gates, is a member of the family, he agreed to contribute to the process of resuscitating him out of this downward energy spiral: How Much Does the Triple “E” Family Care About the Canadian Lawyer?. In that chapter is this passage:
How did his Triple “E” family respond to this outwardly inexplicable circumstance?
[…]
The richest man in the world brought forward an already planned announcement he was re-prioritizing his time between his chairmanship at Microsoft and his philanthropy. […] Mr. Gates appeared in the color he introduced into the lexicon and his Chief Executive Officer, Steve Ballmer, sported Canadian colors – bright red sweater over a white dress shirt.
His work ethic and commitment to diplomacy documentation became a 14 to 18 hour, 7 days a week, effort. Occasionally his brain would literally stop functioning, causing him to collapse on his couch and remain there motionless for at least a half-day. When it happened the first time the coalition got worried and swiftly sought to comfort and inspire him, choosing Mr. Gates and his corporate colleague to do so.
It became apparent that both sides of Jon Stewart’s interview desk wanted to confirm their coalition membership and generate specific communiqués. This was expected given what took place last week about how Canada’s rich, powerful and Chinese turned the Winter Games into the Evil-ypmics (1, 2) and then repeated that confession during the Canadian version of the Haiti telethon.
The first foray into geo-politics comes during Jon’s questions about Mr. Gates’ new Twitter account; one that was went up during the third week of January and almost immediately was converted to coalition advantage after the Custodian Chief added it to his web brower’s Favorites list of links to signal he’d be accessing it daily (see infra). Jon turns the question into an affirmation that both of them are coalition partners; which is followed by him confirming their membership isn’t a part time commitment.
Jon: Have you Twittered a lot -- how many have you done.
Bill: I think about ten, now.
Jon: How many followers do you have [1:08: Paulson M.]?
Bill: Ah, [chuckles] how many do you have?
Jon: I don't Twitter.
Bill: [1:14: Erin M.] Where have you been?
[audience laughter]
Bill: I'm full time on my foundation [1:58: Jon: Branson M.]. That's my primary work.
During Jon’s introduction of the show he makes the mistake of referring to one of Microsoft’s competitors; and during the interview it came up with Jon mitigating his error by way of a joke that he converted to geo-political advantage to underscore the real and at times almost real time reactions the coalition generates to whatever goes on in the diplomatic corridor.
Jon: I see you have the feedback stage all right [2:45: Letterman-Paulson M.]
When Mr. Gates realizes he just used a word that describes what led to stealth cognition technologies he red flags it.
[W]e're also trying to experiment to see if you can have [3:46: Colbert M.] a system where teachers get measured and they get more feedback to help them improve their average quality.
His last contribution is to remind everyone one of the reasons why the Custodian Chief is going from perpetually poor to massively wealthy. Besides being entitled to historic damages, his multi-year commitment to the coalition and helping it to advance and achieve stated objectives leads to generous remuneration and the kinds of documented awards, honors and coveted appointments.
Bill: You have to have a measure and it's very tough to agree on a measure. You know right now the health system [Colbert M.] rewards the person who just...
When CNN announced that Mr. Gates had set up a Twitter account, the Custodian Chief wasted no time accessing it and adding it to his daily routine of diplomacy mediums to watch. The first geo-post is as follows:
Heading to Sundance for the 1st time to see Waiting for Superman, an important movie on education from Davis Guggenheim http://bit.ly/6cLGjw
4:01* PM Jan 21st from web
* compensation ratifier
The link is his new website, in which the following was posted. He indicates he’s going to the famous independent film festival hosted by coalition partner Robert Redford and identifies eight of his films; adding “I have watched all of them at least three times”. Several of them have geo-relevance.
I’m going to the Sundance Film Festival to attend the showing of Waiting for Superman, which is a great film by Davis Guggenheim about the U.S. education system that is coming out later this year. This will be the first time I’ve attended Sundance.
Although I watch very few TV shows, Melinda and I see a lot of movies – at least one per week. I have never really met with movie stars but since I’m going to Sundance, I asked to see if I could meet Robert Redford, whose work I admire.
It looks like I will get to meet him, which will be great. He directed my all time favorite movie – Ordinary People. I also love A River Runs Through It, Quiz Show, and The Horse Whisperer. I really like every movie he directed.
I also like almost every movie he starred in. Some of my favorites include Spy Game, Three Days of the Condor, The Sting, and The Great Gatsby. If you haven’t seen these I highly recommend them! I have watched all of them at least three times.
---------------------------------
An update to one of the posts on our site to clarify - http://bit.ly/85pVOp - conservation plays a big role, of course...
1:22* PM Jan 22nd from web
* compensation ratifier
People often present two timeframes that we should have as goals for CO2 reduction – 30% (off of some baseline) by 2025 and 80% by 2050.
